go to previous section of this publication
Table 5a. Summary of bioassays with IGRs
|
Active ingredient and formulation (g a.i./l or kg) |
Taxon |
Stage |
Max. concentr. per animal or substrate (no of applications *) |
Application and exposure |
Endpoint |
Results |
Comments |
Rating |
|
Triflumuron |
Spiders |
|||||||
|
a) 50 ULV b) 480 SC |
Thanatus sp. Philodromidae) |
subadult |
a) 25 µg b) > 15 µg (3) |
a) topical b) oral |
a, b) mortality and moult |
a, b) no effects |
harmless |
|
|
a) 50 ULV b) 480 SC |
Peucetia viridis (Oxyopidae) |
subadult |
a) 50 µg b) > 50 µg (7) |
a) topical b) oral |
a, b) mortality and moult |
a, b) no effects |
harmless |
|
|
Insects |
||||||||
|
a) 50 ULV b) 480 SC |
Coranus arenaceus (Heteroptera: Reduviidae) |
adult |
a) 25 µg b) > 18 µg (3) |
a) topical b) oral |
a, b) mortality b) fecundity |
a) LD50 = 8.1 µg a.i./bug (95%- CI: 5.7 -11.4 µg) b) reversible reduction in fertility and fecundity with sublethal dose |
a) LD50 > Emax (~ 0.25 µg) |
moderately toxic |
|
50 ULV |
Coranus arenaceus |
larval (L4) |
25 µg |
topical |
mortality and moult |
• LD50 = 0.3 µg a.i./nymph (95%- CI: < 0.1 - 20.9 µg) |
• LD50 > Emax (~ 0.1 µg) • wide 95%- CI, rating therefore provisional |
(highly toxic) |
|
50 ULV |
Pimelia subquadrata chudeaul (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) |
adult |
> 0.4 µg (25) |
oral |
mortality |
• no effects |
• chronic exposure over 25 days |
harmless |
|
Teflubenzuron |
Spiders |
|||||||
|
50 ULV |
Thanatus sp. |
subadult |
25 µg |
topical |
mortality and moult |
• no effects |
||
|
Insects |
||||||||
|
50 ULV |
Coranus arenaceus |
adult |
25 µg |
topical |
mortality |
• LD50= 5.8 µg a.i./bug (95%- CI: 1.7 -19.3 µg) |
• LD50 > Emax (~ 0.25 µg) |
moderately toxic |
|
50 ULV |
Coranus arenaceus |
larval (L4) |
25 µg |
topical |
mortality and moult |
• LD50 = 0.6 µg a.i./nymph (95%- CI: > 0.1 - 31.4 µg) |
• LD50 > Emax (~ 0.1 µg) • wide 95%- CI, rating, therefore provisional |
(highly toxic) |
|
P. subquadrata chudeaui |
adult |
> 0.4 µg (25) |
oral |
mortality |
• chronic exposure (sublethal) over 25 days |
harmless |
||
|
Diflubenzuron |
Insects |
|||||||
|
a) 60 OF b) 250 WP |
Pharoscymnus anchorago (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) |
larval (L4) |
a) 0.6 µg / cm2 b) 2 µg / cm2 |
a, b) residual** |
development to imago |
a) only 14% of larvae develop into imagoes b) EC50 = 0.61 µg a.i./ cm2 (95%- CI: 0.36 - 0.84 µg) EC95 = 1.62 µg a.i./ cm2 (95%- CI: 1.11 - 4.3 µg) |
b) EC50 ~ Emax (0.6 µg) EC95 > Emax • Due to the high remanence of diflubenzuron and thus exposure time the hazard in the field can be higher than in the laboratory test |
highly toxic |
Abbreviations: a.i. = active ingredient; Emax = estimated maximum exposure relative to dorsal surface of the respective organism or surface of the substrate; 95%-CI = 95%-Confidence interval
* multiple treatments of test organisms
** two days' exposure on treated leaves
Table 5b. Summary of bioassays with entomopathogenic fungi
|
Fungal species (both in ULV-formulation) |
Taxon |
Stage |
Max. concentr. per animal or substrate |
Application and exposure |
Endpoint |
Results |
Comments |
Rating |
|
Beauveria bassiana |
Spiders |
|||||||
|
(Conidia, strain GHA 1991) |
Peucetia viridis |
subadult |
5 x 105 SP |
topical |
mortality and infection |
• 90% mortality and infection |
moderately harmful |
|
|
Insects |
||||||||
|
Coranus arenaceus |
adult |
a) 1.25 x 105 SP b) 2.5 x 105 SP/ cm2 |
a) topical b) residual* |
" |
a) 100% mortality and infection b) 89% mortality and infection |
harmful |
||
|
Pimelia subquadrata chudeaui |
adult |
a) 3.75 x 105 SP b) 2.5 x 105 SP/ cm2 |
a) topical b) residual** |
" |
a) 20% mortality and infection b) no effects |
harmless |
||
|
Trachyderma hispida (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) |
adult |
5 x 105 SP |
topical |
a) 30% mortality and infection |
harmless |
|||
|
Metarhizium flavoviride |
insects only |
|||||||
|
(Conidia, strain IMI 330189) |
Cosmopleurus sp. (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) |
adult |
1 x 105 SP/ cm2 |
residual** |
• no infection, but high mortality |
• acute toxicity of carrier substance (kerosene) at 8 l/ha (= 2 x 1013 SP/ha) instead of recommended 2 l/ha (= 5 x 1012 SP/ha) |
harmless |
|
|
Hyles livornica (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) |
larval |
1 x 105 SP |
topical |
• no effects |
harmless |
|||
|
Metarhizium flavoviride |
Spiders |
|||||||
|
(Blastospores strain DSM 11336) |
Thanatus sp. |
subadult |
1 x 104 SP |
topical |
• no effects |
harmless |
||
|
Insects |
||||||||
|
Palpares tesselatus (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) |
larval |
- |
indirect§ |
• no effects |
harmless |
|||
|
Trachyderma hispida |
adult |
5 x 105 SP |
topical |
• no effects |
harmless |
|||
|
Pharoscymnus anchorago |
larval (L4) |
2.5 x 104 SP/ cm2 |
residual§§ |
• no effects |
harmless |
Abbreviation: SP = spores; * permanent exposure via treated food or prey ** permanent exposure via treated plant foods
§ two-time exposure via infected prey (S. gregaria), §§ two days' exposure on treated leaves
Table 5c. Summary of bioassays with Melia volkensii
|
Formulation (g a.i./l) |
Taxon |
Stage |
Max. concentr. per animal or substrate |
Application and exposure |
Endpoint |
Results |
Comments |
Rating |
|
Insects only |
||||||||
|
Ethanolic extract, a.i. content not known precisely |
Coranus arenaceus |
larval (L4) |
5 nl |
topical |
development to imago |
• retardation and arrest of development (age of permanent larvae up to > 15 days) • ED50 = 0.0025 nl a.i./nymph (95%-CI: < 0.001 -0.05 nl) |
• ED50 < Emax (~ 0.025 nl) • wide 95%•CI, rating not possible |
? |
|
Pharoscymnus anchorago |
larval (L4) |
5 µg / cm2 |
residual* |
development to imago |
• retardation and arrest of development (age of permanent larvae [Dauerlarvae] up to > 45 days) • EC50 = 1.14 µg a.i./ cm2 (95%-CI: 0.44 - 2.38 µg) |
• EC50 < Emax (~ 0.1 µg) |
moderately toxic |
Abbreviation: 95-% CI = 95%-confidence interval
* = two days' exposure on treated leaves
Table 5d. Summary of bioassays with conventional products
|
Active Ingredient and formulation (g a.i./l) |
Taxon |
Stage |
Max. concentr. per animal or substrate |
Application and exposure |
Endpoint |
Results (acute toxicity, 96 h *) |
Comments |
Rating |
|
Profenofos Cypermethrin |
Spiders |
|||||||
|
198 + 22 ULV |
Thanatus sp. |
subadult |
5 µg |
topical |
mortality |
• LD50 = 0.28 µg a.i./spider (95%-CI: 0.16 - 0.5 µg) LD95 = 3.08 µg a.i./spider (95%-CI: 0.79 - 12.07 µg) |
• LD50 < Emax (~ 1.1 µg) LD95 > Emax |
highly toxic |
|
Insects |
||||||||
|
198 + 22 ULV |
Coranus arenaceus |
adult |
5 µg |
topical |
mortality |
LD50 = 0.23 µg a.i./bug (95%-CI: 0.14 - 0.37 µg) LD95 = 1.06 µg a.i./bug (95%-CI: 0.48 - 2.35 µg) |
• LD50 < Emax (~ 1.1 µg) LD95 ~ Emax |
highly toxic |
|
Fenitrothion + Esfenvalerate |
Insects |
|||||||
|
245 + 5 ULV |
P. subquadrata chudeaui a) weight < 0.8 g b) weight > 0.8 g |
adult |
a, b) 16 µg |
topical |
mortality |
a) LD50 =2.03 µg a.i./beetle (95%- CI:1.11- 2.97 µg) LD95 = 4.06 µg a.i./beetle (95%-CI: 2.82 - 17.41 µg) b) LD50 =3.49 µg a.i./beetle (95%- CI: 1.71 - 5.07 µg) LD95 = 6.96 µg a.i./beetle (95%-CI: 4.84 - 26.72 µg) |
a) LD50 < Emax (~ 3.75 µg) LD95 ~ Emax b) LD50 < Emax (~ 4 µg) LD95 > Emax |
moderately toxic |
|
245 + 5 ULV |
T. hispida a) weight < 1 g b) weight > 1 g |
adult |
a, b) 32 µg |
topical |
mortality |
a) LD50 = 6.07 µg a.i./beetle (95%-CI: 4.72 - 7.23 µg) b) LD50 = 9.0 µg a.i./beetle (95%- CI: 7.0 -11.33 µg) |
a) LD50 > Emax (~ 5 µg) b) LD50 > Emax (~ 6.25 µg) LD95 > Emax • on mild overdose slightly harmful |
moderately toxic |
|
245 + 5 ULV |
Pharoscymnus anchorago |
larval (L4) |
6.25 µg / cm2 |
residual** |
mortality |
• LC50 = 0.35 µg a.i./ cm2 (95%-CI: 0.11 - 0.73 µg) LC95 = 5.72 µg a.i./ cm2 (95%-CI: 2.72 -18.75 µg) |
• LC50 < Emax (~ 2.5 µg) LC95 > Emax |
highly toxic |
Abbreviations: a.i. = active ingredient, Emax = estimated maximum exposure relative to the dorsal surface of the respective organism or the surface of the substrate; 95%- CI = 95%-confidence interval
* with P. anchorago after 48 h
** two days' exposure on treated leaves
2.1.3.2 Field tests
Two products were investigated in field tests in the Akjoujt region, triflumuron (Alsystin 050 UL) and M. flavoviride (IMI 330I89). The investigations focused on the terrestrial arthropod fauna, which were collected and examined using pitfall traps and direct methods of collection.
Methods and risk classification
As a rule, the highest recommended dosage is tested in field tests. In Mauritania a different approach was taken, which involved testing one low and one high dosage for each product. In the case of triflumuron, the dosages were 25 and 100 g a.i./ha. The first value represents the lower limit of the recommended field rates, whereas the second represents a "worst case scenario". M. flavoviride was also tested in a single (5 x 1012 conidiospores/ha) and a quadruple dose (2 x 1013 conidiospores/ha). The plot size was I to 2 ha. These were isolated islands of vegetation, covered with relatively dense stands of annual plants such as S. thebaica, Fagonia olivieri and Hyoscyamus muticus (degree of coverage 40 - 90%), and surrounded by largely vegetation-free sandy or stony desert. The natural isolation of these microbiotopes prevents a rapid exchange of fauna with other biotopes, at least with regard to terrestrial arthropods incapable of flight. The duration of the tests was approximately 6 weeks (2 weeks before and 4 weeks after application). During this period, the arthropod fauna were examined at intervals of two days. The effects were calculated by comparing the relative abundance of the various taxa before and after application with the relative abundance of the same taxa in control plots which were also under investigation at the same time. A distinction was made here between acute effects immediately after application (approximately 10 days) and late effects (> 10 days).
Risk classification was performed on an analogous basis to the laboratory trials, using a four-point scale as proposed inter alia by the BBA (1992):
|
Risk class |
Effect* |
Rating |
|
I |
< 25 % |
harmless |
|
II |
> 25 % |
slightly harmful |
|
III |
> 50 % |
moderately harmful |
|
IV |
> 75 % |
harmful |
* e.g. mortality, reduction in the parasitisation or predation rate, etc.
Compared to the scale for evaluation of the field tests, the boundaries of the risk classes here have been shifted downward by a considerable margin, as exposure in laboratory trials is as a rule considerably higher than under field conditions. It should be noted in this context, however, that field trials are also not evaluated on a standardised basis. In addition, methodological and biological factors make it more difficult to clearly distinguish between coincidental and insecticide-induced effects, in which case the effects can be either positive (increase in relative abundance) or negative (reduction).
Results
The results of the field trials are summarised in Table 5e. The various arthropods were allocated to risk classes II - IV only when the relative increase in abundance was > 25% and statistically significant. Non-significant reductions > 25%, as well as significant and non-significant increases, were interpreted as risk class I (harmless).
I. Triflumuron
Cicadellids were affected severely by triflumuron at both low and high doses (class IV). The effect was especially pronounced during the later phase of the trial. The delayed effect indicated that predominantly nymphs were exposed and - like the similarly hemimetabolous locusts - died during the next moult. At 100 g a.i./ha the spider Thanatus sp. was also severely reduced. Further investigations showed that juvenile spiders in particular were affected, and that they were affected less by the active ingredient itself than by residues of the formulation agents of low volatility. In addition, slight hazards (class II) were observed in calliphorids (100 g a.i./ha) which was, however, interpreted as a chance result. Caterpillars of Heliothis peltigera sustained moderate hazard (class III) at the higher dosage. Since IGRs are applied primarily to control lepidopteran pests, this effect had been anticipated. All other taxa remained unaffected by triflumuron.
II. Metarhizium flavoviride
Apart from beetles (class II), no significant side-effects of the fungal preparation were observed. Since a significant reduction in abundance was recorded only with the single, but not with the quadruple dosage, it cannot be concluded that the effect was an insecticidal one. One striking observation was the extraordinarily sharp increase in flying insects (Diptera, Hymenoptera) in the treated plots. It was not possible to establish whether the large number of animals caught was due to hyperactivity, hatching or immigration. The one observation crucial for the evaluation, however, was the fact that there was no significant reduction in abundance.
III. Comparative evaluation of the two control agents
For both preparations, a single dose produced minor side-effects on terrestrial arthropods. Whilst cicadellids were severely affected by triflumuron, this family in the traditional sense is in fact considered more a target than a non-target organism. The same applies to H. peltigera. On the other hand, the application of triflumuron must be assumed to pose a threat in principle to all butterfly fauna. Application of 100g a.i./ha triflumuron also produced severe harmful side-effects on the spider Thanatus sp., which is numbered among the beneficial fauna. Since fewer toxic solvents are now being used in more recent ULV formulations, however, there need be no reservations concerning the use of this product in locust breeding areas away from stagnant waters. It should be emphasised that the applications for entomopathogenic fungi and IGRs are entirely different. Whilst the former are appropriate essentially as biological contact insecticides for direct control of nymphs - and thus compete with the acutely toxic carbamate, organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides - the latter are appropriate for barrier application within the scope of preventive control.
Table 5e. Side-effects of triflumuron and M. flavoviride on arthropods: summary of the results of 4 field trials (frequent taxa only).
|
Triflumuron |
Metarhizium flavoviride |
|||||||||||
|
Taxa |
25 g a.i./ha |
100 g a.i./ha |
5 x 1012 spores/ha |
2 x 1013 spores/ha |
||||||||
|
Effect/risk class |
E (%), acute |
E (%), late |
Risk class |
E (%), acute |
E (%), late |
Risk class |
E (%), acute |
E (%), late |
Risk class |
E (%), acute |
E (%), late |
Risk class |
|
Spiders: Thanatus sp. |
+ 7 |
0 |
I |
-51** |
-113** |
IV |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
Insects: Homoptera, Cicadellidae |
-20* |
-94** |
IV |
-26* |
-76** |
IV |
-18** |
+1 |
I |
-22* |
-19 |
I |
|
Heteroptera, Reduviidae: Coranus aranaceus |
-25 |
-27 |
I |
-18 |
-66 |
I |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
Coleoptera |
+3 |
-20 |
I |
+1 |
-32 |
I |
-21 |
-36* |
II |
+13 |
-10 |
I |
|
Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae |
+2 |
-17 |
I |
-1 |
-48 |
I |
+7 |
-11 |
I |
-4 |
-1 |
I |
|
Tenebrionidae: Mesostena angustata |
-14 |
-22 |
I |
-5 |
-81 |
I |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
Tenebrionidae: Zophosis quadrilineata |
+13 |
+5 |
I |
-1 |
+39 |
I |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
Coleoptera, Anthicidae: Notoxus sp. |
-29 |
-36 |
I |
n.a. |
n.a. |
-54 |
-13 |
I |
+41 |
-24 |
I |
|
|
Hymenoptera, Apoidea |
+9 |
-1 |
I |
+4 |
+1 |
I |
-16 |
-2 |
I |
-28 |
+10 |
I |
|
Hymenoptera, Sphecidae |
+27* |
-36 |
I |
+44 |
-43 |
I |
+206* |
+445* |
I |
+7 |
+46* |
I |
|
Hymenoptera, Formicidae |
-10 |
-18 |
I |
-1 |
+23 |
I |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
Hymenopt., Form.: Monomorium arenophilum |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
+8 |
+36 |
I |
-15 |
-9 |
I |
||
|
Diptera |
-6 |
-6 |
I |
+26 |
+7 |
I |
-13 |
+111** |
II |
+22* |
+95* |
I |
|
Diptera, Calliphoridae |
-22 |
-9 |
I |
-2 |
-37* |
II |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
Diptera, Tachinidae |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
+ 6 |
+332* |
I |
+14 |
+145 |
I |
||
|
Lepidopt., Noctuidae: Heliothis peltigera (larv.) |
-33 |
+19 |
I |
-25* |
-61** |
III |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||
|
Microlepidoptera (adult) |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
-20 |
+32 |
I |
-9 |
+9 |
I |
||
Abbreviations: a.i. = active ingredient; n.a. = not available (taxa which either were not distinguished or which occurred only in small numbers); E = effect (= relative increase/decrease in abundance after treatment); level of significance: p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**); See text for risk classes