go to previous section of this publication

 

2.3 Importance of predators

 

2.3.1 Hopper consumption by birds

Hopper bands are attacked by numerous predators. Several species of birds and one hymenopteran species were particularly effective. In Section 2.1.2.2 the loss under natural conditions of bands treated with botanicals was already mentioned. Even at the station itself the sparrows proved themselves to be effective locust catchers. Not only did they pick up all the larvae which escaped from the holding cages, they also made an active attempt to get into the cages. In various experiments, the number of larvae devoured or killed by the sparrows was measured over a period of 3 h (Tab. 8).

Some hundred hoppers (3rd or 4th instar) were reared in a field cage (2x2x2 m) which was set up near to nesting places of birds (Passer simplex saharae). Some holes were made in the cage's side wall big enough for the hoppers to escape, but too small for the birds to invade.

Tab. 8 Hopper consumption by Passer simplex saharae

Trial

Time

No. of birds

No. of hoppers killed

Hoppers/bird

1

30

4

63

15.8

2

30

4

49

12.3

3

30

5

61

12.2

4

30

4

55

13.8

5

30

4

48

12.0

6

30

5

51

10.2

The trials were conducted on two days between 9.00 and 12-00 a.m. The temperatures increased from 23° C to 27° C. The majority of the hoppers (nearly 2/3) were eaten immediately. The killed hoppers left on the ground were also consumed within 3 h of the trials being completed.

Tab. 9 Field observation of hopper band consumption by birds

Year

Initial hopper band
size

Instar

Bird species

Time of attack
(days)

Hoppers left

1993

130 000*

4th

Cursoris cursor

6

<1000

1994

180 000*

4th

various

4

<5 000

1995

190 000*

2nd

various

10

<500

1995

250 000

2nd

various

11

<5 000

1995

180 000

3rd

Passer luteus

10

<300

1995

1 100 000*

2nd to 3rd

various

9

<50 000

1995

500 000*

4th

various

10

<5 000

various: Passer luteus, Lanius spec. and others
*These hopper bands were treated with sublethal dosages of neem oil (content of active ingredient less than 300 ppm/l) 3 to 5 days before the end of observations. The mortality rate caused by neem oil was below 40 % (cage control), although hopper mobility was reduced, i.e. the daily distances migrated decreased from nearly 1000 m to less than 250 m.

 

Similar observations without precise quantification were carried out in 1993 in Brumduid. In the field trials conducted at that location, not only untreated bands but also bands treated with neem oil and Metarhizium spores (C. Kooyman, personal communication) were consumed almost completely by various bird species.

 

2.3.2 Influence of predatory wasps

Among the predatory insects a sphecid wasp was observed, since it is a very effective hopper predator. Populations of some thousands of wasps followed hopper bands, caught the hoppers and carried them into their holes dug in the ground and arranged in so-called wasp fields of up to more than 100 m2 in size (Tab. 10). These activities were repeated each day after the hopper bands had reached the 3rd instar, and were reduced after the hopper bands had undergone moult to the 5th instar.

Table 10 Impact of sphecid wasps on hopper bands

Field no.

No. of larvae/hopper band

Size of wasp field (m)

Mean no. of holes (n=3)

Total no. of holes

Mean no. of larvae/hole (n=6)

1

80 000 - 150 000

36

40

1 440

 

2

80 000 - 150 000

33.75

52.7

1 778

11.3

3

> 300 000

108

52.3

5 652

13.1

4

10 000 - 15 000

10.5

28

294

 

5

80 000 - 150 000

72

50

3 600

 

6

> 500 000

107.25

55.3

5 931

10.6

7

600 000 - 700 000

112.5

49

5 513

 

The investigation of around 50 holes revealed an average of 11 paralysed hoppers per hole. Assuming that the wasps' activity were extended to 10 to 12 days, all hopper bands in Table 10 would be reduced to less than 20 % of their original size.

The observation of and experiments with predators demonstrate that hopper bands of up to around 100 000 individuals can be heavily decimated or even totally exterminated by predators, which is highly consistent with earlier findings. In the case of plagues, however, the importance of predators remains doubtful, but should nevertheless be investigated, especially when the predator populations also increase during the course of such a plague.

go to next section of this publication